Nomad Rear Fender Skirts To Go From Harley Bagger To Cruiser And Back

nomadskirts1nomadskirts2The Nomad Fender Skirts allow you to change the look and function of you Harley-Davidson from touring cruising and back in less than 5 minutes. Just remove your bags and bolt-on the skirts then remove the skirts and re-install your bags.

No modifications are required on 2014 and up Harley tourers (will also fit 1993-2013 HD touring bikes with a slight modification).

The Nomad Fender Skirts are made of high quality hand-laid fiberglass. They will need some sanding preparation before paint. You will need to purchase from Harley-Davidson 4 cushion saddlebag supports (Part #: 90200611) and 4 saddlebag isolators (Part #: 90200611) Patent pending. MSRP $349.95 for the set. At First Shot Cycle Parts. Tel: 602-478-5587

34 Responses to “Nomad Rear Fender Skirts To Go From Harley Bagger To Cruiser And Back”

  1. 1 Wolfe Feb 16th, 2016 at 10:29 am

    Why, is all I ask. I can not understand the drive for this part.

  2. 2 djones Feb 16th, 2016 at 10:33 am

    Really? there is a market for this?

  3. 3 rb Feb 16th, 2016 at 10:34 am

    Haha it must be a joke

  4. 4 Terence Bohler Feb 16th, 2016 at 10:35 am

    Not bad looking, but marginal sales.

  5. 5 Mark Bailey Feb 16th, 2016 at 10:45 am

    I think they look great, I’m ordering them now.

  6. 6 richards Feb 16th, 2016 at 11:44 am

    Must be April 1…

  7. 7 rebel Feb 16th, 2016 at 12:20 pm

    seems like a better idea would be to make a standard shape bag from the side but 3″ thick like the razor t/pack, call ’em book bags

  8. 8 Bob Athey Feb 16th, 2016 at 12:40 pm

    These are so stupid, and stupid. Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should. If you want a metric, than buy a metric.

  9. 9 Mark Bailey Feb 16th, 2016 at 1:27 pm

    The big wheel baggers were and are stupid, but you all see what happened with those.

  10. 10 nicker Feb 16th, 2016 at 1:29 pm

    Why not.
    No sense in schlepping bags from bar to bar if your not hauling anything.

    That is, unless your planning to tell stories about all the paces you haven’t been.


  11. 11 Woody's Feb 16th, 2016 at 2:43 pm

    Interesting concept, but they don’t really flow well from the sidecover and the lower area sticks out on a part that’s supposed to replace the girth of a saddlebag-a contradiction for sure. They probably looked better on the bench during the design stage than they look on the bike, a mistake I’ve made myself 🙁
    I think a second version that fits tight to the sidecovers and and has less mass at the bottom would be a good addition to the line, perhaps more like wheelwell covers from 50’s & 60’s cars. Lots of labor to do a second shape, but since they’re open-molded it’d be easy to lay up a second prototype set of pieces and alter them visually without losing all the work already put into the mounting locations. Wish them well, it’s a fresh idea.

  12. 12 highrpm Feb 16th, 2016 at 4:59 pm

    any utility besides looks?

  13. 13 Steal Your Face Feb 16th, 2016 at 5:48 pm

    Lame. If you don’t like the look of saddlebags, why buy a bagger? Plus those covers don’t look any better than saddlebags. Now where do I mount my amps and speakers? (Kidding)

  14. 14 ferris bueller Feb 16th, 2016 at 7:00 pm


  15. 15 H-D heathen Feb 16th, 2016 at 7:42 pm

    Shades of Kawasaki’s Drifter model (and Indian.)

  16. 16 Matt W. Feb 16th, 2016 at 7:55 pm


  17. 17 bigalyts Feb 16th, 2016 at 9:18 pm

    I guess the Seat & Ass Theory are a fact.

  18. 18 Seymour Feb 16th, 2016 at 10:09 pm

    Or just keep your bags on

  19. 19 ozzie21 Feb 17th, 2016 at 12:08 am


  20. 20 SoCalPhun Feb 17th, 2016 at 1:32 am

    I’m not hater but these are a head scratcher for me.

  21. 21 Badams Feb 17th, 2016 at 2:52 am

    This is really strange.

  22. 22 Mdsphoto Feb 17th, 2016 at 8:11 am

    Ummmmm, I don’t get it?

  23. 23 Emmett Feb 17th, 2016 at 8:52 am

    Maybe should have considered a Dyna Switchback if you want on again off again bags??
    Love mine.

  24. 24 rickkcir Feb 17th, 2016 at 9:06 am


  25. 25 John M Feb 17th, 2016 at 9:44 am

    OMG, those are butt-ugly but so are 26″ wheel baggers and you see plenty of those around……

  26. 26 2Wheels Feb 17th, 2016 at 9:57 am

    …or you could just buy an Indian that is designed to look good with or without the bags.

  27. 27 Boomer Feb 17th, 2016 at 10:57 am

    I try to find something good to say about everything but with these; I got nothing.

  28. 28 Krossfire Feb 17th, 2016 at 11:12 am

    if you want fender skirts, buy an Indian….

  29. 29 58_pan Feb 17th, 2016 at 4:43 pm

    Not the worst idea but the execution is lacking in my opinion. They don’t flow with the stock side covers and I agree with Woody’s that they should be more like 50’s and 60’s wheel well covers.

  30. 30 nicker Feb 17th, 2016 at 8:09 pm

    Took another look.
    Seems reminiscent of the 50’s era tail-drager lead sleds (without a continental kit).

    Still looks OK to me….


  31. 31 RUB Feb 19th, 2016 at 10:44 am

    if only they had a set for a sporty , now that would be cool !

  32. 32 steve Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:51 am

    Not a fan….they also make a nice saddlebag tray….but I’m not paying 16.00 to ship an item that size….

  33. 33 DaveSmith Feb 29th, 2016 at 6:43 pm

    Looks like they were a door prize from a Tupperware party.

  34. 34 cw Mar 4th, 2016 at 6:28 pm

    Looks like Nomads thought a solution to hide the ugly when u remove the bags off ur bagger, kinda a stretch

Comments are currently closed.
Cyril Huze