Sturgis Rally Trademark Fight. Conflicts of Interest and Intimidation Exposed?

Aaron W. Davis, Partner at Patterson Thuente Christensen Pedersen, P.A., the counsel of Rushmore Photo & Gifts Inc. is launching a vigorous defense and counter-attack against Sturgis Motorcycle Rally (SMRI), its companies and individual members. The conflict between SMRI and Rushmore Photo & Gifts and other Sturgis merchandise vendors arised from the fact that SMRI tries to enforce a Sturgis Rally trademark, want to charge a licensing fee to all vendors selling Sturgis related merchandise and threaten vendors who would not comply.

Defendants allege that to acquire the registration for name STURGIS, SMRI made a sworn statement to the US Patent & Trademark Office stating that STURGIS was exclusively used by the Sturgis Chamber Of Commerce from 1987 to 2001, and that this statement is false. Below are all the allegations made by Paul Nieman co-owner of Rushmore Photo & Gifts (RPG) via its legal council. RPG tries to federate other Sturgis merchandise vendors opposing SMRI trademark enforcements. (I disclose that I was not able to verify any allegations contained in the document below)      

Licensing fees for “Sturgis” trademarks being paid to Connecticut corporation:
Rushmore Photo & Gifts (RPG) has discovered that the license agreement that Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, Inc. (SMRI) has been forcing vendors to sign in order to sell Sturgis products requires that the licensing fees be paid to Good Sports, Inc., not SMRI. Good Sports is a Connecticut corporation owned by Jerry Berkowitz, vice chair of the SMRI board of directors. Sounds like a conflict of interest to me. Makes you wonder what other conflicts of interest exist on the SMRI board, stated Paul Niemann, co-owner of RPG. Last month, SMRI sued RPG and the Niemann family for allegedly infringing SMRI‘s supposed trademark rights in the name―Sturgis. RPG, a local, Rapid City business has been in existence since 1937, and has sold Sturgis-related merchandise since at least 1987. Nonetheless, SMRI, which just formed in 2010, has alleged that it is the exclusive owner of the right to use and license others to use the name―Sturgis.

SMRI has publicly represented that it is a philanthropic organization created for the betterment of the Sturgis community, said Niemann. The fact that the licensing money is paid to a board member‘s out-of-state company, Good Sports, and not to SMRI itself, makes one seriously question how pure the intentions of the individuals on the SMRI board are. Based on its Annual Report with the State of South Dakota, SMRI‘s board of directors includes the following people, who are affiliated with the following businesses:

1. Dean Kinney, Chairman of SMRI – owns entertainment booking company HomeSlice as well as an interest in Loud American Roadhouse and various vacation rental properties.
2. Jerry Berkowitz, Vice Chair of SMRI – owns Good Sports, Inc. and Hot Leathers
3. Jim Burgess, Vice Chair of SMRI – part owner of several South Dakota Harley-Davidson dealerships
4. John Johnson – officer at First Interstate Bank in Sturgis
5. Ross Lamphere – owner of Lamphere Ranch Campground and the Lamphere Ranch
6. Jamie McVay – owner of Black Hills Drywall and Sturgis City Council member
7. Karen Simmons, Treasurer of SMRI – CPA and board liaison to the Sturgis Chamber of Commerce
8. Susan Johnson – CEO of Deadwood Central Reservations

In recent days, reports have also surfaced that SMRI has held itself out as representing the City and people of Sturgis, as it threatens vendors selling Sturgis-related products that their goods will be confiscated during the Rally if they did not obtain a license from SMRI to use the name Sturgis. Some media reports confirm that many vendors have been afraid to speak up out of fear that SMRI would retaliate against them, and that there will be 30-50% fewer vendors at the Rally this year because of the intimidation surrounding the Sturgis trademarkissue. This will mean a major loss of tax revenue and vendor fees for the City of Sturgis,‖ warned Niemann.

 SMRI does not represent the City of Sturgis or its residents,  nor does SMRI put on the Rally, clarified Neiman. Indeed, the City of Sturgis‘ website states that, the ownership of the Marks does not belong to the City of Sturgis, nor does the City Council or any City official have control over the use or licensing of the Marks. (http://www.sturgis-sd.gov/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=697) Anyone who is holding out to vendors that SMRI represents the City of Sturgis is perpetuating a lie, added Niemann. RPG has sworn that SMRI‘s threats and intimidation against vendors will be uncovered during the be uncovered the lawsuit.

We plan to hold the individuals engaged in these fear tactics accountable and personally liable, whether they be individual board members, their companies, or otherwise, contended Niemann. Additional questions for which Niemann and his attorneys would like answers include: Do the companies owned by individual SMRI board members pay any licensing fees for use of the name ―Sturgis, or is it just everyone else that supposedly has to pay? How in good faith can the board members enforce the ―Sturgis‖ registration, particularly against local businesses, when the registration was obtained based on what were clearly false statements? Who on the board is responsible for intimidating local vendors using this fraudulently-obtained registration?

Attorney Aaron Davis, partner in the Patterson Thuente IP firm and RPG‘s litigation counsel, has made his intentions clear that he plans to question each of the SMRI board members during the discovery phase of the federal lawsuit. We also plan to hold all individuals and their related companies accountable to the extent allowed by law for the wrongful actions relating to the fraudulent procurement and enforcement of the ill-gotten Sturgis‘ registration. For the good of the community and my clients, the truth must come out and the persons responsible must be held to account, vowed Davis. Niemann agreed,―the truth will be exposed.

Zipper's

22 Responses to “Sturgis Rally Trademark Fight. Conflicts of Interest and Intimidation Exposed?”


  1. 1 chopmonster66 Jul 15th, 2011 at 8:33 am

    sounds like a bunch of greedy people have got there buts in a big pile of buffelo crap !!! power to the venders.!!!

  2. 2 Boss Hawg Jul 15th, 2011 at 8:36 am

    Attorneys, Bankers.

    Me personally, nor will any my friends, loved ones or associates knowingly purchase any Hot Leathers’ products and my back seater has cancelled her Hot Leathers account. We will not do any business at any of the South Dakota HD shops either or knowingly purchase, attend or give any moneys to any vendor, bar, event, bank, drywall contractor, resort, etc….that any of the 8 above knowingly have interests in.

    Pretty much sums it…no money in drys up the coffers.

    Boss Hawg

    .

  3. 3 Nobody Jul 15th, 2011 at 9:44 am

    Thanks for the btip off as to who owns what. I’ll be adding these to a list I keep in my shop, of people/places to not deal with or buy from.

  4. 4 Unkl Ian Jul 15th, 2011 at 9:49 am

    Didn’t someone try a similar scam in Daytona, claiming rights to the name ?

  5. 5 Boss Hawg Jul 15th, 2011 at 10:05 am

    With Cyril’s blessings, here is another great article that reinforces Cyril’s great work. This should paint the picture for you. http://www.dealernews.com/dealernews/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=727810

    Boss Hawg

  6. 6 Hamilton Jul 15th, 2011 at 10:16 am

    Berkowicz (Hot Leathers), member of SMRI charges a fee to the Sturgis vendors, then print the tee-shirts for them? First step, boycott all Hot Leathers merchandise in all rallies. Anyway, Hot Leathers sell crappy stuff. He is the same guy who oppose a trademark on Daytona Bike Week….because he can’t get it.

  7. 7 Bruce Jul 15th, 2011 at 10:21 am

    The name STURGIS belongs to all those who attend the rally. I can’t wait until SMRI lose this trademark after spending hundreds of thousands in lawyer fees. I agree, boycott Hot Leathers. The guy is the definition of arrogant and greedy.

  8. 8 Mr. Potts Jul 15th, 2011 at 10:27 am

    The meaning of Sturgis seems to be left behind when “big money” starts to take over!

  9. 9 TRexSG Jul 15th, 2011 at 10:28 am

    Can you say bye bye Sturgis?

  10. 10 XH-D Rider Jul 15th, 2011 at 10:37 am

    Cyril
    What does the resident of Sturgis get out of the rally. Like no taxes or what
    Thanks

  11. 11 burnout Jul 15th, 2011 at 10:38 am

    Absolutely right Boss Hawg, these “bored” members have shot themselves in their own back pocket. Idiots! peace

  12. 12 DW Jul 15th, 2011 at 11:56 am

    Boss Hawg – you can be critical of the individuals behind this and their actions, without using bigoted slurs like that. Not sure what anyones religious affiliation have to do with anything. Substitute “Hebe” with “Catholic” or “Mormon” or any other religion, and it is just as silly, pointless, and offensive a remark.

  13. 13 burnout Jul 15th, 2011 at 12:09 pm

    In my town (Montgomery AL) is a statue of Hebe the Greek goddess of youth. ? peace

  14. 14 Unkl Ian Jul 15th, 2011 at 12:31 pm

    Shouldn’t the name(s) be considered public domain ?

    Maybe they will trademark United States of America next.

  15. 15 Kustoms and Choppers Jul 15th, 2011 at 5:08 pm

    Why do people always try things like this?

  16. 16 Roadkill Jul 15th, 2011 at 6:03 pm

    SMRI = GREED! Jerry is the one pulling the strings. He out to get rid of all his competitors.

  17. 17 Bigalyts Jul 15th, 2011 at 10:14 pm

    Like I said before we need a Full Fledged American Holiday to celebrate the Attorney’s in this Country! Everybody should take an Attorney out Swimming for that Day.! We should “Dunk them 3 times, but only bring them up twice’!

  18. 18 cyclereckr Jul 16th, 2011 at 7:40 am

    I heard an attorney say ” We (attorney’s) don’t make the laws, we mold them to say what we want!

  19. 19 MotorcycleMarc Jul 16th, 2011 at 9:36 am

    This “Sturgis” TRADEMARK will be very difficult, if not impossible, for the new owners to defend given the storied and wonderful public use of the word “Sturgis”over decades. Just another example of our legal system causing loss of good money.

  20. 20 HAwk Jul 16th, 2011 at 1:01 pm

    I’m with Boss Hawg. No longer will I do any business with Hot Leathers and I’ll encourage anyone I know who rides to do the same. If enough do this it will hit them where it counts,the bottom line.

  1. 1 Sturgis 2011= My first!!! - Bike Talk Motorcycle Forum Pingback on Jul 16th, 2011 at 12:31 am
  2. 2 Sturgis Rally Trademark Fight. Conflicts of Interest and Intimidation Exposed? GREED OR PRESERVATION?? | ProRidersMarketing Pingback on Jul 16th, 2011 at 7:45 am
Comments are currently closed.
S&S
Crusher
S&S
Barnett
S&S

Subscribe

Socialize

Facebook Google+ Twitter