New Harley-Davidson Screamin’ Eagle High Capacity Oil Pan Holds More Lube. Keeps It Cooler.

High-Capacity-Oil-Pan1Great for a high-performance motor or for touring in extreme temperature conditions, this cast-aluminum oil pan holds 1.5 quarts more oil than the Original Equipment pan.

Increased capacity means the oil cycles through the engine less frequently and remains in the pan longer. Cast-in internal baffles manage flow to the oil pickup and keep the hot oil exposed to the heat-conducting, ribbed-aluminum sump.

An easy-access oil drain hole is located at the side of the oil pan. This kit includes the cast aluminum oil pan and pan gasket, and fits 2009-later Touring (except Trike) models. The new Screamin’ Eagle High Capacity Oil Pan (P/N 24400099, $599.95)is available at your Harley-Davidson Dealer.

19 Responses to “New Harley-Davidson Screamin’ Eagle High Capacity Oil Pan Holds More Lube. Keeps It Cooler.”


  1. 1 Mike Greenwald Nov 16th, 2013 at 2:34 pm

    Increased oil capacity is now and has been needed for all HD motors.

  2. 2 Doc Robinson Nov 16th, 2013 at 3:05 pm

    If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, Bert Baker must be feeling very flattered right now.

  3. 3 Dave Blevins Nov 16th, 2013 at 4:54 pm

    Doc,
    I was thinking the same thing. Of course some of us guys were putting oil tanks under the transmission on custom bikes years ago, just for a hidden look… but twin cam motors really should have this as a standard feature in my opinion.

  4. 4 Industry guy Nov 16th, 2013 at 5:14 pm

    Baker +1 knockoff.

    Bakers also has hookup for the alloy art TXR stabilizer. The cure for the stability problem Harley Davidson will never admit to.

  5. 5 rob Nov 16th, 2013 at 5:53 pm

    Amazing how the MoCo rips off so many designs…………..

  6. 6 Rodent Nov 16th, 2013 at 7:59 pm

    The MoCo don’t rip off others, after all they invented the wheel!

  7. 7 Terence Tory Nov 17th, 2013 at 8:29 am

    I shudder to think of how many “upgrades” are sold for Harley-Davidson motors.You don’t hear Ducati,Suzuki or BMW selling so many parts to make a bike function the way it should have when it rolled off the showroom floor.

  8. 8 Calif Phil Nov 17th, 2013 at 11:40 am

    I would get the Baker even if it cost more. HD should be ashamed for ripping off Baker Drivetrain.

  9. 9 Xroads Nov 17th, 2013 at 1:00 pm

    So many of us worship, live and breathe H-D and 365 days a year customers/followers get ripped off by them in so many ways, not to mention all the out-right lies I hear about that most believe is gospel because “they said it”……BS! Frin wrenching on both H-D and metrics I often see where the MoCo copies and steals ideas from the metric mfgs and aftermarket companies. I keep wondering when we’ll see a new H-D with a driveshaft, lol!

  10. 10 ray c wheeler Nov 17th, 2013 at 2:36 pm

    Hey Bert….

    The motor company likes you shit…….

    Royalty check in the mail.

    Buy Baker.. ………Kick it in gear and support Bert and his Crew…….

  11. 11 ray c wheeler Nov 17th, 2013 at 2:38 pm

    The motor company likes your shit…. oops….missed a letter.

  12. 12 Xroads Nov 17th, 2013 at 3:04 pm

    Oooppss here too……….*From wrenching….I meant to say

  13. 13 TONY DAVIDSON Nov 17th, 2013 at 8:38 pm

    BUY THE BEST IS BAKERS PRODUCTS NOT HD

  14. 14 richard Nov 18th, 2013 at 11:40 am

    I doubt that Baker originated the this technique. Increased oil capacity/volume has been used by heavy duty (mostly diesel) engine builders for 40 years or more. As horse power was increased, engine temperature increased leading to accelerated normal and adhesive (scuffing/seizure) wear. This frequently resulted in reduced engine durability and primarily piston and piston ring scuffing and catastrophic failure. The engine manufacturers simply started installing larger capacity oil pans. The increased oil volume helped conduct heat and allowed cooler operating temps. It’s apparent that the Harley engineers have adopted this technique for the same reasons in their hotter running engines. Bigger displacements and emission requirements (leaner burns, higher combustion temps) have likely been the drivers to necessitate this change in engines where it’s shown beneficial.

  15. 15 takehikes Nov 18th, 2013 at 12:06 pm

    And only $600 bucks for something that should have been on our pigs to begin with.
    Screamin Eagle? I think not, more like Screaming Checkbook….

  16. 16 Slow Ride Nov 19th, 2013 at 3:11 pm

    Harley didn’t steal the idea from Baker. I remember when Carrol Shelby designed a larger oil pan back in the 60’s! This idea is decades old. Do a Google image search for “shelby oil pan”.

  17. 17 Sputter Nov 20th, 2013 at 9:32 am

    Slow Ride – Yes they did and if I were Baker, I would be heading over to a patent attorney, first thing in the morning.

  18. 18 Blackmax Nov 20th, 2013 at 7:08 pm

    Bert Baker forever, Cheap rip offs, never !!!!!!

  19. 19 Jake A. Nov 21st, 2013 at 3:04 pm

    Wow that’s a blatant Baker rip off! I don’t think anyone is disputing that larger oil pans have existed, but come on, design wise its the same thing as Bakers. That’s cheap.

Comments are currently closed.
Cyril Huze